Amid the Trump administration’s recent demands for K-12 schools to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices, New York state officials have firmly stated their intention to resist such directives. The federal administration is threatening to withdraw federal education funding if schools do not comply.

State Officials’ Response

In a letter dated Friday, Daniel Morton-Bentley, Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Department of Education, articulated the state’s stance. He emphasized that the federal Education Department lacks the authority to impose its interpretation of federal laws on states or to terminate funding without following established administrative processes.

Morton-Bentley stated, “We understand that the current administration seeks to censor anything it deems ‘diversity, equity & inclusion.’ But there are no federal or State laws prohibiting the principles of DEI.” This highlights the state’s position against what they see as an overreach of federal power.

Federal Requirements and Implications

On Thursday, the Trump administration mandated schools across the nation to certify compliance with federal civil rights laws, particularly regarding any allegedly discriminatory DEI initiatives. This certification is tied to the receipt of federal funds, which account for approximately 6% of New York’s K-12 education budget.

Craig Trainor, the acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, remarked, “Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right,” indicating that schools that do not comply may face financial consequences. He accused some institutions of using DEI programs to discriminate against others, prompting this new directive.

Historical Context and Future Implications

Morton-Bentley pointed out that New York has previously assured the federal government of its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, most recently in January, and he criticized the Trump administration’s shift in policy. He referred to earlier statements from the first Trump administration, wherein former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos acknowledged that diversity and inclusion were vital for successful organizations.

This change in the administration’s stance raised concerns among critics, who argue it contradicts Trump’s earlier commitment to decentralize education and return control to states and local entities.

Broader Consequences

New York State’s decision to resist these federal demands mirrors its previous defiance regarding other initiatives from the Trump administration, such as the attempt to alter funding mechanisms for mass transit in New York City. This ongoing tension highlights the complexities of state and federal relationships, especially in the arena of education and financial regulation.